Tuesday, November 28, 2023
HomeTECHResearch indicates that an AI system could validate Wikipedia citations, enhancing reliability

Research indicates that an AI system could validate Wikipedia citations, enhancing reliability

Can artificial intelligence (AI) clean up the global writers' collective online encyclopedia?


It is crucial that you consult the original sources listed in the foot notes. Because you can’t rely solely on information found on a Wikipedia page. However, you might occasionally get misled by even the primary sources. Through algorithmic training, researchers have created a system (AI). Designed to enhance the trustworthiness of Wikipedia references by identifying dubious citations on the platform.

Programme “SIDE”

SIDE is a programme that does two tasks. It finds new primary sources and verifies the accuracy of existing ones. Still, the AI functions based on the supposition that a Wikipedia entry is accurate. This implies that although it can validate a source. It is unable to independently confirm statements stated in an entry.

A Study

Researchers found that 70% of the time, participants preferred the AI’s recommended citations over the original ones. The study’s findings revealed that SIDE provided the primary reference in almost half of the instances. A source that Wikipedia utilised beforehand. By human annotators in the study 21% of the time, putting it one step ahead of the game.

Although the AI seems to show that it can assist an editor in properly verifying claims on Wikipedia. The researchers acknowledge that other programmes may perform faster and more accurately than their current design. SIDE’s functionality is restricted because it only takes into account references that correspond to web pages. In actuality, Wikipedia references books, scholarly works, and information. That is provided in formats other than text such as photographs and videos. Beyond its technical limitations, however, Wikipedia’s fundamental tenet is that any writer, anywhere, can add a reference to any topic. The researchers speculate that the study may be limited by the use of Wikipedia itself. They hint that, depending on the subjects covered, people who enter citations onto the website may introduce bias.


As everyone knows, programmes, and artificial intelligence in particular. Vulnerable to revealing the prejudices of the people who wrote them. There may be restrictions on the data utilised to assess and train SIDE’s models. However, there may be other uses for AI. If it can be used to expedite fact-checking or at the very least be used as a helpful tool. False information flooding digital town squares by bots. Unethical actors is a problem that social media firms and Wikipedia must deal with. This is particularly relevant and true right now. Given the false information that is circulating on the Israel-Hamas conflict and the impending US presidential elections.

MYI News World has the most recent news, blogs, job updates, educational pieces, and a wealth of other helpful information. We are aware that you require current, comprehensible, and easily readable news, and MYI News World satisfies that need.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments

canadian pharmacies shipping to usa on Internet Revolution Effects on Honey Bees
Translate »